ER Physician Tyler Johnson Settles Years-Long Malpractice Case
A years-long malpractice lawsuit against Indiana Senator Tyler Johnson, who is also an ER physician, has recently been settled. The case, which predates Johnson’s 2022 election, involved the 2018 death of 20-year-old Esperanza Umana. The lawsuit has raised questions about medical negligence and the role of review panels in medical malpractice cases.
HCN Medical Memo
This case serves as a cautionary tale about the complexities and potential pitfalls of medical malpractice litigation. It also highlights the role of medical review panels in the legal process, which can significantly impact the outcome. Given that Johnson is not only a physician but also a legislator involved in healthcare policy, the case underscores the multifaceted challenges healthcare professionals may face in today’s legal and political landscape.
- The malpractice case was filed by Jennifer Becerra, the mother of Esperanza Umana, who died in 2018 after receiving care from Johnson at Parkview Regional Medical Center.
- Court filings allege that Umana had a history of asthma and sepsis, and that Johnson’s treatment “overloaded” her lungs with fluid, leading to her death.
- A medical review panel in Indiana ruled in March 2022 that Johnson “deviated from appropriate standards of care.”
- Johnson’s account of the case differs significantly, claiming that Umana was alert and responsive at the time of discharge.
“Based on Umana’s condition at the time I saw her, her death was not foreseeable. Had she appeared too ill for discharge or had her presentation suggested any risk of a fatal event, I would not have discharged her.”
– Dr. Tyler Johnson in his affidavit
- This is the third time malpractice charges have been brought against Johnson, but the first time a medical review board agreed with the charges.
- Johnson has been involved in controversial healthcare legislation, including a ban on gender-affirming care for minors and a case aiming to block access to abortion medication.
- Johnson argued that the case should be paused during legislative sessions and that court records should be sealed, but the judge disagreed.
More Legal Matters Posts