The merit-based incentive payment system (MIPS), which adjusts clinician Medicare Part B payments for performance on quality, cost, improvement activities, and use of certified EHR technology for interoperability, along with EOM quality measurement systems for Medicare, should ideally be meaningful to physicians and patients and coordinated to magnify the quality signal. How do these novel methods compare, then, in terms of genuinely comprehending the standard of cancer care provided to Medicare beneficiaries?