Vitamin D’s Complex Role: Negative Acute-Phase Reactant in Inflammatory States
The article examines the widespread increase in vitamin D testing and supplementation, questioning its evidence-based rationale. It highlights the complexity of interpreting vitamin D levels, particularly 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D), in the context of inflammation. The authors present evidence suggesting that 25(OH)D may act as a negative acute-phase reactant, complicating the assessment of true vitamin D deficiency and the justification for supplementation in many cases.
Key Points:
- Vitamin D testing and supplementation have increased dramatically:
- Medicare patients’ vitamin D tests increased 547% from 2007 to 2016
- Vitamin D supplement sales reached $936 million in 2017, a 9-fold increase over the previous decade
- Projected supplement sales to reach $1.3 billion by 2025
- Vitamin D status evaluation is problematic:
- Debate over which blood test (1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D or 25[OH]D) is most informative
- Lack of consensus on optimal blood levels and cutoff points for deficiency/insufficiency
- Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency is considered high:
- 41.6% of American adults had serum 25(OH)D levels below 20 ng/mL in 2011
- Estimated 1 billion people worldwide have vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency
- Evidence supports 25(OH)D as a negative acute-phase reactant:
- Inverse association between serum C-reactive protein and 25(OH)D levels
- Low 25(OH)D levels associated with various inflammatory states
- 25(OH)D levels decrease after inflammatory insults (e.g., surgery)
- Persistent low levels in obesity despite aggressive supplementation
- Acute-phase response involves various physiological changes during inflammation:
- C-reactive protein and fibrinogen are positive acute-phase proteins
- Albumin and transferrin are negative acute-phase proteins
- Some vitamins, including vitamin D, may exhibit negative acute-phase behavior
- Low-grade inflammation (metaflammation) is common:
- Affects approximately 30% of the US population
- Associated with numerous conditions and lifestyles
- Triggered by sentinel cells monitoring deviations from homeostasis
- Vitamin D’s proposed roles beyond skeletal health:
- Modulation of immune responses
- Potential inhibition of inflammation
- Possible reduction in cancer and cardiovascular events
- Clinical trials on vitamin D supplementation:
- No significant reduction in all-cause mortality, cancer, or cardiovascular disease
- No significant difference in major health-related outcomes for COVID-19
- Recommendations for vitamin D testing:
- “Choosing Wisely” campaigns advise against population-based testing
- Testing recommended only for select medical conditions
- Interpreting low vitamin D levels:
- Consider the presence of systemic inflammation (eg, elevated C-reactive protein)
- Low 25(OH)D may reflect inflammation rather than true deficiency
HCN Medical Memo
Physicians should exercise caution when interpreting low vitamin D levels and prescribing supplements. Consider the patient’s overall inflammatory status and focus on vitamin D testing in specific high-risk populations rather than as a routine screening tool.
More on Vitamins/Supplements