Peer-influenced content. Sources you trust. No registration required. This is HCN.

Journal of Invasive Cardiology (JIC)Comparison of Fixed Dose Versus Weight-Adjusted Heparin on the Prevention of Radial Artery Occlusion After Diagnostic Transradial Catheterization

A randomized trial of 1,494 patients evaluated whether weight-adjusted heparin doses affect radial artery occlusion (RAO) rates in diagnostic transradial catheterization. The study compared outcomes across four quartiles of weight-adjusted heparin dosing, all using a standard fixed dose of 5000 IU. The findings challenge current weight-based dosing recommendations and suggest potential benefits of standardized protocols.


Key Points:

  • RAO rates showed no significant differences across weight-adjusted heparin quartiles: 2.1% (<58.14 IU/kg), 2.6% (58.14-65.79 IU/kg), 2.8% (65.79-74.63 IU/kg), and 3.0% (>74.63 IU/kg); P=.86
  • Comparison of extreme dosages (<50 IU/kg vs >80 IU/kg) revealed similar RAO rates (1.9% vs 2.5%; P=.71), with no major bleeding events reported
  • The fixed 5000 IU heparin dose proved effective across all weight groups, potentially simplifying anticoagulation protocols in diagnostic procedures
  • Short-duration pneumatic compression was used uniformly for hemostasis, likely contributing to consistently low RAO rates
  • Study limitations include lack of ultrasound guidance during access and exclusion of interventional procedures from analysis

HCN Medical Memo
Standard fixed-dose heparin (5000 IU) provides effective RAO prevention across weight ranges, potentially streamlining catheterization laboratory protocols without compromising safety.


Vascular Medicine Summaries

The Healthcare Communications Network is owned and operated by IQVIA Inc.

Click below to leave this site and continue to IQVIA’s Privacy Choices form