The New England Journal of MedicineRestrictive or Liberal Transfusion Strategy in Myocardial Infarction and Anemia

Evaluating Transfusion Strategies in Myocardial Infarction: Balancing Risks and Benefits

A recent phase 3 interventional trial investigated the impact of different transfusion strategies on patients with acute myocardial infarction and anemia. This study is pivotal for medical professionals in determining the most effective transfusion approach for these patients.

Study Design:

• Participants: 3,504 patients with myocardial infarction and hemoglobin levels less than 10 g per deciliter.
• Transfusion Strategies:
  • Restrictive Strategy: Transfusion when hemoglobin falls below 7 or 8 g per deciliter.
  • Liberal Strategy: Transfusion when hemoglobin is less than 10 g per deciliter.
• Primary Outcome Measured: Incidence of myocardial infarction or death within 30 days.

Key Findings:

• Transfusion Volume: Average of 0.7 units in the restrictive group versus 2.5 units in the liberal group.
• Hemoglobin Levels: 1.3 to 1.6 g/dl lower in the restrictive group during the first three days post-randomization.
• Primary Outcome Events: Occurred in 16.9% of the restrictive group and 14.5% of the liberal group.
• Risk Ratios:
  • Overall primary outcome: 1.15 (95% CI, 0.99 to 1.34; P=0.07).
  • Death: 1.19 (95% CI, 0.96 to 1.47) for the restrictive group.
  • Myocardial Infarction: 1.19 (95% CI, 0.94 to 1.49) for the restrictive group.

HCN Medical Memo
Anemia is a common comorbidity in patients with acute myocardial infarction, affecting outcomes. A study by the American Heart Association found that anemia is associated with a higher incidence of myocardial infarction and increased hospital mortality.

More on Anemia