Articles related to IMAGING/SCREENING

The study, led by Michael Bretthauer, MD, PhD, of the University of Oslo in Norway, found that people who were invited to have a screening colonoscopy had a lower risk of colorectal cancer than those who were not, though at a lower rate than researchers expected. Furthermore, no significant difference in colorectal cancer-related mortality was discovered between the two groups.

Scientists have started questioning the veracity of images accompanying University of Minnesota Sylvain Lesné, PhD’s studies touting major breakthroughs. Lesné’s images had supported a theory that oligomer species Aβ*56 was the most important of many oligomers thought to be more pathogenic than other plaques — and thus, a potential drug target.

Offering 0.25 credits, this 30-minute CME program discusses the new cervical cancer screening guidelines recently published by both the American Society for Colonoscopy and Cervical Pathology (ASCCP) and the American Cancer Society (ACS).

This case of a 51-year-old man with a 1-month history of multiple eruptive seborrheic keratoses on his back and a single painless nodule on his chest exemplifies the importance of performing a thorough evaluation in patients presenting with sudden-onset eruptive seborrheic keratoses.

We already shared the story about the financial advantage of AI being used in colonoscopies — here is a related story featuring key takeaways regarding the importance of screening in younger people, new techniques such as linked color imaging, and the non-invasive modality MRI colonography.

Technology to the rescue. Employing artificial intelligence (AI) during a colonoscopy could save money and lead to earlier detection of cancer and better health outcomes for patients. AI detection tools also were associated with a cost savings of $57 per patient after lowering discounted costs from $3,400 to $3,343, which persisted in secondary colonoscopy modeling analysis.