Peer-influenced content. Sources you trust. No registration required. This is HCN.

Annals of Internal MedicineComparison of Semaglutide or Dulaglutide Versus Empagliflozin for Risk for Death and Cardiovascular Outcomes Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

This target trial emulation study analyzes real-world cardiovascular outcomes data from 703 clinical practices, comparing GLP-1 receptor agonists against SGLT-2 inhibitors over median 2.2-year follow-up. The observational design with propensity score matching provides moderate-quality evidence for clinical decision-making in diabetes management.


⚕️ Key Clinical Considerations ⚕️

  • Semaglutide demonstrated 11% relative risk reduction for composite death/MI/stroke versus empagliflozin (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.78-1.02), though confidence interval crosses null.
  • Stroke risk showed significant 38% reduction with semaglutide (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.43-0.89), representing strongest individual outcome benefit.
  • Dulaglutide showed no cardiovascular advantage over empagliflozin (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.90-1.16), suggesting class-specific rather than class-wide effects.
  • Death and myocardial infarction risks were similar between semaglutide and empagliflozin groups, limiting overall composite outcome significance.
  • Observational design introduces potential residual confounding despite propensity matching, requiring cautious interpretation of comparative effectiveness claims.

🎯 Clinical Practice Impact 🎯

  • Patient Communication: Stroke prevention benefits with semaglutide provide compelling discussion point for patients with cerebrovascular risk factors, while emphasizing that overall cardiovascular benefits remain modest and require individualized risk assessment.
  • Practice Integration: Results support preferential semaglutide selection over empagliflozin when stroke prevention is prioritized, though dulaglutide appears equivalent to SGLT-2 inhibitors for cardiovascular outcomes.
  • Risk Management: Lack of cause-specific mortality data limits ability to counsel patients on specific death risk reduction, requiring focus on composite outcomes and stroke-specific benefits.
  • Action Items: Consider patient-specific cardiovascular risk profiles when choosing between GLP-1 agonists, with semaglutide preferred for stroke-prone patients and dulaglutide reserved for other clinical indications.

More on SGLT2 Inhibitors

The Healthcare Communications Network is owned and operated by IQVIA Inc.

Click below to leave this site and continue to IQVIA’s Privacy Choices form