
This article discusses limitations of standard lipid panels for cardiovascular risk assessment, highlighting the potential clinical value of advanced markers like LDL particle number (LDL-P) and apolipoprotein B (ApoB). The content represents expert opinion rather than new research, citing observations from clinical practice about patients with discordant LDL-C and LDL-P values who may be misclassified using traditional testing alone.
Key Clinical Considerations
- Evidence for discordance: Patients with “normal” LDL-C levels may still harbor elevated cardiovascular risk due to high LDL particle numbers, creating a risk assessment gap in current practice.
- Alternative biomarkers: ApoB and LDL-P are presented as potentially superior predictors of cardiovascular risk compared to standard lipid measurements like LDL-C.
- High-risk populations: The article identifies specific patient groups who may benefit most from advanced testing: those with metabolic syndrome, family history of premature ASCVD, or unexplained risk profiles.
- Lipoprotein(a) testing: Lp(a) is highlighted as a strong genetic risk factor for atherosclerosis that remains absent from standard lipid panels despite its clinical significance.
- Implementation gap: While making a case for advanced testing, the article acknowledges these markers are not yet mainstream in clinical practice, suggesting advocacy is needed.
Clinical Practice Impact
- Patient risk stratification: Consider advanced lipid testing for patients with risk factors but “normal” traditional lipid panels, especially those with metabolic syndrome or family history of premature CVD.
- Communication strategy: When explaining cardiovascular risk to patients, distinguish between cholesterol concentration (LDL-C) and particle number (LDL-P) to provide more complete risk information.
- Test selection guidance: Order ApoB or LDL-P testing selectively based on clinical suspicion of discordance, not universally, to optimize resource utilization.
- Guideline awareness: Note that although these markers show promise, current guidelines still primarily recommend standard lipid panels, requiring clinical judgment when ordering advanced tests.
More on Lipid Health