Peer-influenced content. Sources you trust. No registration required. This is HCN.

The New England Journal of MedicineVideo versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Urgent Intubation of Newborn Infants

Improved First-Attempt Success with Video Laryngoscopy in Neonatal Urgent Intubation

This recent study examines the efficacy of video laryngoscopy compared to direct laryngoscopy in achieving successful first-attempt intubations among newborns requiring urgent airway management. The findings highlight the potential benefits of incorporating video laryngoscopy into neonatal intensive care protocols.

Study Design:

  • Setting: Single-center trial conducted in both the delivery room and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).
  • Participants: A total of 226 neonates of any gestational age were enrolled, with 214 completing the study.
  • Methods: Neonates were randomly assigned to either video laryngoscopy or direct laryngoscopy groups, stratified by gestational age (<32 weeks or ≥32 weeks).
  • Primary Outcome: Success of intubation on the first attempt, verified by exhaled carbon dioxide detection.

Key Findings:

  • First-Attempt Success Rate: 74% in the video-laryngoscopy group vs. 45% in the direct-laryngoscopy group (p<0.001).
  • Intubation Attempts: Median number of attempts was 1 for video laryngoscopy and 2 for direct laryngoscopy.
  • Physiological Measurements: Lower median oxygen saturation and heart rate were observed in the direct laryngoscopy group during intubation.

HCN Medical Memo
This study substantiates the use of video laryngoscopy in neonatal urgent care settings as a viable method to enhance the success rates of first-attempt intubations. Incorporating this technology could lead to improved patient outcomes by minimizing the physiological stress and potential complications associated with repeated intubation attempts.

More on Neonatology

The Healthcare Communications Network is owned and operated by IQVIA Inc.

Click below to leave this site and continue to IQVIA’s Privacy Choices form