A randomized study in Blood compared DAGO2 (daunorubicin/cytarabine plus fractionated gemtuzumab ozogamicin) against CPX-351 in 439 previously untreated AML patients aged 60 or older without adverse-risk cytogenetics. 3-year overall survival reached 52% with DAGO2 versus 35% with CPX.
Clinical Considerations
- 3-year event-free survival was 34% with DAGO2 versus 27% with CPX, with overall survival favoring DAGO2 by 17 percentage points
- Initial complete remission rates favored DAGO2 at 60% versus 47.5% for CPX after the first chemotherapy course
- Intensified CPX-351 dosing did not improve outcomes over standard CPX, raising questions about dose-escalation strategy in this population
- Population was primarily de novo AML with intermediate-risk cytogenetics; results may not extrapolate to adverse-risk or secondary AML
Practice Applications
- Consider DAGO2 as a preferred intensive regimen for fit older AML patients without adverse-risk cytogenetics
- Recognize CPX-351’s strongest evidence remains in therapy-related and AML with myelodysplasia-related changes, not the population studied here
- Interpret results within the trial’s intermediate-risk de novo AML population before broader application
- Integrate MRD status after first course into decisions about intensification
More in AML
PATIENT EDUCATION
OBESITY/WEIGHT MANAGEMENT
EXERCISE/TRAINING
LEGAL MATTERS
GUIDELINES/RECOMMENDATIONS