Evaluating Nutritional Strategies for Preterm Infants
In a comprehensive investigation into the effectiveness of various nutritional interventions for moderate-to-late preterm infants, a new multicenter, factorial, randomized trial provides valuable insights. This study meticulously assesses the impact of different feeding strategies on infant development, offering data-driven guidance to enhance neonatal care practices.
Study Design:
- Participants: The trial included 532 infants born between 32 weeks 0 days and 35 weeks 6 days of gestation, with a nearly even gender distribution (55% male).
- Interventions: Infants were randomly assigned to receive either intravenous amino acids or dextrose solution until full milk feeding was established; a milk supplement or exclusive mother’s breast milk when maternal milk was insufficient; and either exposure to taste and smell prior to gastric-tube feeding or no sensory exposure.
- Objective: The primary goals were to measure body-fat percentage at 4 months of corrected gestational age and to record the time until full enteral feeding was achieved.
Key Findings:
- Body Composition: No significant differences were found in body-fat percentage at 4 months between infants receiving parenteral nutrition versus those receiving dextrose solution, or between those receiving milk supplements versus exclusive breast milk.
- Enteral Feeding Time: The introduction of taste and smell did not significantly reduce the time to achieve full enteral feeding.
- Adverse Events: Only one serious adverse event was reported, highlighting the general safety of the interventions.
HCN Medical Memo
Although the trial did not identify a superior nutritional intervention for moderate-to-late preterm infants, it reinforces the safety and adequacy of existing feeding practices. These findings suggest that standard nutritional support is appropriate for this population, providing a solid foundation for ongoing research and optimization of preterm infant care.
More on Neonatology